Most popular

What did Alexis de Tocqueville say about tyranny of the majority?

What did Alexis de Tocqueville say about tyranny of the majority?

According to Tocqueville, the power of the majority arises from the fact that in a democracy every individual is, politically, the equal of every other individual. In this situation, the greatest power will always be the largest number of individuals who combine their strength to act together: normally, a majority.

What could be the tyranny of the majority result in?

The tyranny of the majority (or tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate pursues exclusively its own objectives at the expense of those of the minority factions.

What was Alexis de Tocqueville concerned about when he warned against the tyranny of the majority?

The book Tocqueville produced — a first volume published in 1835, and a more somber one five years later — is full of keen observations about America. And he was concerned about tyranny of opinion, saying he knew of no country with “less independence of mind and true freedom of discussion” than America.

How did Alexis de Tocqueville react to his visit to the United States what impressed and what worried him?

Tocqueville was impressed by much of what he saw in American life, admiring the stability of its economy and wondering at the popularity of its churches. He also noted the irony of the freedom-loving nation’s mistreatment of Native Americans and its embrace of slavery.

What could the tyranny of majority result in * 1 point discrimination coercion both of the above?

The tyranny of the majority community may result in discrimination, coercion and even killing of people from the minority communities. Some people may want to interpret religious teachings differently. Such freedom needs to be protected. So, it is necessary to separate religion from the State in a democratic society.

What do you mean by tyranny of the majority explain the constitutional safeguards provided for the protection of minority in India?

Tyranny of majority implies a situation where majority tries imposes its decisions on the minorities. The act ensures protection of minorities and seeks to provide justice to them.

Does Alexis de Tocqueville’s argument about the tyranny of the majority reflect American democracy today quizlet?

Does Alexis de Tocqueville’s argument about the tyranny of the majority reflect American democracy today? The majority outweighs the minority and individual rights of people. Whatever the majority wants is what they get. If an individual is wronged there is no one to go to if everyone supports the majority.

What does Tocqueville mean by equality of conditions?

Tocqueville sees democracy or equality of conditions as having an “immense influence on the whole course of society.” (p. 9) More generally, he argues that the “social state” is “the prime cause of most of the laws, customs, and ideas” in a society.

What is Tocqueville’s tyranny of the majority?

He further argues that tendency to acquiesce in the rightness of majority opinion has negative long-term consequences on national character and culture. EDSITEment’s new unit, Tocqueville on Tyranny of the Majority, breaks down Tocqueville’s argument into its component parts.

What is Tocqueville’s view of democracy?

Tocqueville does not mean that the majority in a democracy will always act tyrannically, only that nothing can prevent it from so doing. He further argues that tendency to acquiesce in the rightness of majority opinion has negative long-term consequences on national character and culture.

What is Tocqueville’s subject matter?

His subject is nothing less than what is to be hoped for, and what to be feared from, the democratic revolution sweeping the Western world in his time. The greatest danger Tocqueville saw was that public opinion would become an all-powerful force, and that the majority could tyrannize unpopular minorities and marginal individuals.

What is the best example of Tocqueville’s theory of the Civil War?

Tocqueville offers two gripping and illuminating examples: mob violence against anti-war journalists in the War of 1812; and the way free blacks are preventing from voting in the Northern states.